Argument: An Inconvenient Truth

Al Gore describes the truth about global warming in “An Inconvenient Truth”. Many people say that the movie is fantastic and important, but a few have the opposite opinion. Now I will discuss two reviews of the movie, one positive and one negative. As well, I will write my opinion at the end.
In the negative review, the critic Kevin said that Al Gore tries to say if I don’t come to the white house, the polar ice will melt and the entire world fall down. So, he is the savior of the world. This movie made him the only savior. Also the American people should vote for the environmentally friendly people. In the truth, it is political movie, but Al Gore tries to say not. Besides, there is no politician honest. As well, there is no real science for his theories, and Al Gore uses events that are not involved with global warming (Kevin, C).
In the positive review, the critic Boo said that Al Gore gives numbers to the public for warming and displays the dangers of Global warming. The oil companies and U.S car manufactures must see this research. Also politicians who pander to companies instead of finding a solutions or facing this disaster. Al Gore backs-up all his theories by scientific evidence. Also he displays photos of the damage area and charts and tables. All of his theories are pretty persuasive and we must work on this soon (Boo, A).
In general, I believe that all the evidence in An Inconvenient Truth are satisfactory and we should follow Al Gore to help the planet, because we are all involved in this case.







Bibliography
-AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH. 24 May 2006. Kevin Carr. 3 Mar. 2009 .

-AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH. 4 June 2006. Boo Allen. 3 Mar. 2009 .